Forums


Go Back   The TrekEarth Forums >

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools

Great melmcree 2008-01-23 8:25

Hey Jorge,

This one is really nice. I love the colors and the little reflections of the gulls on the water. Creates a nice romantic mood. I have 2 questions though. Why such a small dof and why such a high ISO? I honestly can't see how it affected it because the photo is so good I was just curious about the settings.

Mel

  #1  
Old 01-23-2008, 06:39 PM
JorgeCK's Avatar
JorgeCK JorgeCK is offline
TE Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 165
Default To melmcree: DOF

Hi Mel,
Thank you for your nice comments.
I used a smaller aperture f32.0 to get a better DOF. Since I always seem to have problems with the sharpness of my pictures I decided to use a smaller aperture and increase my ISO.
At the time that I took this picture it was dusk.
Basically I traded a little bit of noise in the picture for sharpness. I read this suggestion in a photograhy magazine.

I have other pictures at home that I took the same day with different setups. I will email them to you tomorrow so you can see the different effects.
take care
Jorge
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-23-2008, 08:39 PM
melmcree's Avatar
melmcree melmcree is offline
TE Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 76
Default Re: To melmcree: DOF

I see what you mean. I have heard several discussions on TE about how the smaller the aperture the less sharpness you actually get. I always thought that if f/2.8 was a small depth of field that f/32 would be sharp all the way though but others disagreed. I actually did a test setup with my own 17-40 f4L lens and set it up on a tripod. I took left the focus in one spot and went through all the f-stops. F/11 was the sharpest of them all and after f/16 it dropped off quiet a bit. F/22 wasn't very good at all. That's why if you look at almost all my landscapes they are shot at f/11. I was just curious as to why you set it up that way. It's obvious it worked out because your photo looks great.

Thanks for your insight,

Mel
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2008, 02:01 AM
kwazireal's Avatar
kwazireal kwazireal is offline
TE Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 81
Default Re: To melmcree: DOF

Jorge

Above f/16 you also get into a technical phenomenon called reciprocity, which is like a de-facto change in effective ISO. The slight additional DOF, at the cost of reduced absolute sharpness and reduced brightness at higher f/stops is usually not worth the trade-off.

Regards,

Chris
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 AM.



Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.
explore TREKEARTH