#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
16-85 VR is not a f/2.8 my dear Didier.
For me 18-200 VR is astonishing. I'is a little bit heavy but less than 2 zoom lenses in your bag like 18-55 + 55-200 kit plastic mouting lenses. Just a problem with using the embedded flash. It produces a shadow because the diameter of the 18-200 VR. Of course if you compare the 18-200 with a PRO f2.8 lens it's not the same quality ! |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i know :)
I meant the 16-85 is a light lense compared to the f/2.8 lenses :) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
OK. Merci encore à vous deux...
Viviane * Peut-être un dernier avis sur le Nikkor 18-135mm ? |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
ben, je ne le connais pas plus que cela...
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Pour quelques grammes de moins c'est dommage, le 18-200 est mieux construit et a le VR!
Amicalement JP |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|